


Last week, while I was working on an infernally difficult case for clinic1, I started another short story. It takes place in part on the subway, because that’s where I was spending a lot of my time, commuting from the law school to the downtown clinic office.
The protagonist, whose name is Katie, has obsessive-compulsive disorder, and some phobias, and possibly a few other things. In the story proper, we learn that she has a phobia of cars, but she also loathes germs, thanks to the OCD, which makes commuting extremely difficult for her. She’s also a lawyer2--a trusts and estates lawyer, which makes her attention to detail a Good Thing(tm).
I have read a lot of blog posts from fantasy/sci-fi novelists discussing the portrayal of disabilities in our genre. I agree that it is troubling to include physically disabled characters in our fiction *only* when we give that character some kind of special, magical trait/ability to “make up” for his or her disability. It seems much better to portray the character with a physical disability managing his disability in his daily life and living his life as his personality dictates, just like people do in the real world. He does *not* need magical powers to make him a “whole” person. Nor does he need them to defeat Ye Olde Evil-Doer.
My character, Katie, got me thinking. I know how I feel about writing about characters with physical disabilities. But I don’t know how this should translate (if at all) to writing about characters with psychological conditions. So, in Katie’s case, am I being a hypocrite by showing how my character benefits from her condition in her work (to the extent that she does)? Her condition certainly bleeds into her personality; and I am showing how she suffers because of her condition, too, as well as how she tries to cope with it. It is not giving her superpowers.
But writing about her still makes me sort of nervous. I’m not a psychologist by any stretch of the imagination. More to the point, I don’t have OCD. I don’t want to offend people who have OCD3 or who have loved ones with it. I am fascinated by psychology, think about it all the time, and try to understand the human mind. But my understanding of it is not perfect. Not even close.
Here’s the thing, though. Even though I don’t have OCD, I *really* relate to the condition. This character, Katie, is more like me than any of the other characters I have ever written.4 Even though she has OCD. For that matter, even though she is 40 and I’m 24, or even though she is a partner at a trusts and estates law firm, while I am a law student with aspirations to public service, and so on. We’re different, but if I met her in real life, I would feel like I understood her. Like we would “get” each other.
The conundrum reminds me of the controversial post from a few months back by E. Bear (
matociquala ), although she was talking about the Other in sci-fi/fantasy in general, with a focus on race. If I relate to Katie, am I still writing about the Other, even though she has a psychological condition that I do not have? I can’t tell where the process of character-building turns into writing about the Other, especially where psychological conditions are concerned.
For that matter, now that I look at it, it seems like a lot of my characters could be diagnosed with some kind of psychological condition, if they had access to modern psychology. From compulsively stealing to severe depression, my characters are a troubled lot. If I tried to break the usual mold of my writing, consequently, I’d end up writing about someone relentlessly happy and suburbia-normal. (Now *that* sounds like the Other to me. :) )5
What do you lot think? Do you see commonalities in your characters? Do you write about the Other? What aspect of the Other do you write about? Where do psychological conditions fall into this mix?
--London
Edited to fix some wonky formatting... apologies... :)
........................................
1. Since finished. Don’t worry.
2. My very first lawyer character.
3. Now, don’t get me wrong... you’re always going to offend somebody with your writing, even if you write about bougainvillea or bouillabaisse. But I am of the school of thought that you should offend *intentionally*--in the sense that you should know what you are saying (on the various levels through which it can be interpreted, not just the most obvious one to you) and you should believe what you’re saying, too. If I don’t know very much about mental illness, how can I know what I’m writing about on all these levels, and be certain that I believe in it? You see my conundrum. :)
4. Except maybe one, Ressy, who is from my Cora novels. Ressy opens up another can of worms for me as a writer. More on that some other time.
5. Frequent readers will notice that I have actually already done this, when I accidentally wrote a short story that was completely realist (no fantasy! wtf?!), from a man’s pov, and set in modern-day America. I broke my mold in every way with that story (except for the geeky obsession with ancient languages), and that includes writing about a relatively normal, well-adjusted guy.
![]() | You are viewing Log in Create a LiveJournal Account Learn more | Explore LJ: Life Entertainment Music Culture News & Politics Technology |